ZEN and the art of maintenance in a finite mind

Mistakes can usually be fixed.

Sin, however, is a violation of infinite rule, and can therefore only be forgiven by the Infinite Power of Divine Being.


In our finite world humankind relies on a rule of law to keep order, based on finite laws, imposed by mankind in various forms and at various venues in time and space, throughout the finite world.

It is not a love of money that is at the root of evil;
a love of money distorts perception, perspective, and rational thought, causing an inability to distinguish good from evil, despite a tiny finite knowledge of the subject.

In the realm of the finite there is no basis for knowing the difference between good and evil.

A finite being cannot digest the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

Any attempt at ingesting and digesting, into meaningful nutrition, that fruit causes never-ending convulsions in the finite system

DIFFERENCES ARE REALITY BASED –
DISTINCTIONS ARE THOUGHT BASED
The difference between the rule of law and the spirit of aloha is that the first comes from senses of necessity and lack,
While the second comes from senses of abundance & generosity…

This Sunday is the end of the first twelfth of Twenty Ten

I am working on a hypothesis that the root of all evil is a specious concept, planted by Lucifer in the Garden of Eden to grow what we call ‘the grapes of wrath’ east of Eden.

Sin is a morality based concept that was not a part of paradise. Mistakes happen. Mistakes can be fixed. Unless they are perceived as sin. Such as ‘nakedness,’ nudity, lasciviousness, ‘I know what you were/are thinking’type DNA junk.
So with a taste of the knowledge of good and evil naturally came ‘judging’ and the necessity for the golden rule.
And mankind's morality based inability to practice the golden rule.

I call this "THE DIVINE CONUNDRUM"

My Brain Is A Stomach For My Mind ; Trash In – Pukes Me

God only (and me) knows when that happens. . .

'ALL ABOUT' Can be an active verb, or a conceptual adjective - depending on who You are, today!

NEW BLOGS FOR OLD, New Blogs for old, anon

Any woman who is not a kissing cousin is (a) fair game
Except, perhaps, your sister . . .

Sexuality rhymes with duality
SO WHAT?
The Shadow Knows . . .


As in ‘shadow of your former self’?

Words without borders
Q’s without A’s

Aphorism for the day:
A woman without a man
Is something like
Perfection without a miracle

WHEREAS, AND AFORETHOUGHT
A male lawyer without a case
Is pretty commonplace, according to women who judge

But then
The Supreme Court
Has instructed us to
Judge NOT
W T F, does that mean?

(is that a verb
or a dangling participle?)

We are now on Clicky - whatever that means

OH YEAH

COGITO; Ergo sum.

I think of myself as profoundly whimsical
And/or whimsically profound
Obviously, this isn’t for reasons of public image
I think it must be inspiration and/or revelation . .


Legal terminologically speaking
The year 2009 was a watershed year in my life
And I think 2010 begins a Landmark decade

Every beginning
Except the first
Is also an ending?



I like to think;
Therefore I am . .

A Q 4 U

Q. ARE HUMAN BEINGS (‘homosaps’) FUNGIBLE?
Why or Why not?

A NO
Each has a different soul.